Pro-Life Video Rejected by Leftist NBC and CNN Networks
Written by admin on | March 10, 2009 | No Comments
Many pro-aborts say that a tough childhood or possibility of poverty is enough reason to kill the unborn. That is sick and evil. Many poor people grow up to become successful, and killing the innocent before they are born is not a solution, but a problem. See the video below. Obama hypocritically supports the killing of the disadvantaged and yet he was disadvantaged before he became a pseudo-saviour to the ignorant masses.
Barack Obama Reverses Another Pro-Life Policy
Written by admin on | March 10, 2009 | No Comments
Even though we can get pluripotent stem cells from bone marrow and blood cord, Obama unsurprisingly reversed the pro-life policy to ban federal taxpayer dollars to kill embryos–tiny human beings–for experimentation. Just another pro-abortion extremist policy from Obama.
National Review has an article about it. Killing human beings for the potential benefit is unethical and wrong. We should help the suffering with adult stem cells, not by taking it from cloned embryos, creating embryos just to kill them or taking them from “extra” embryos which could be adopted and implanted. These are tiny human beings. Killing innocent human beings is evil, regardless of age or development. Bush had not even banned it, but rather said that no tax dollars should go to killing embryos for experimentation. It should be defunded and banned, and instead we should invest more in adult stem cell research, which has actually helped many people. Adult stem cells can help people, and scientists have learned how to make them pluripotent, or able to be turned into different tissues. This is just a form of child sacrifice, the killing of the innocent and is evil and should not happen. Fetal experimentation, much like embryonic experimentation (embryonic stem cell research), also involves killing human beings, but instead of embryos, it is fetuses who are killed. Body parts are then sold to companies and universities to experiment on them. Both should be banned, and instead, ethical science should flourish.
Obama wrongly calls opposition to the killing of tiny human beings for research as “ideology.” But he has ideology, too–his ideology states that it’s okay to kill innocent human beings for profit and possible but not real benefit. Science cannot function without ethics.
Tags: barack obama > Embryonic Experimentation > stem cells
Jonah Golberg is Quite Possibly a Genius.
Written by admin on | March 10, 2009 | No Comments
Jonah Golderg, author of Liberal Fascism, has a hilarious spoof of the messianic appeals of Barack Obama, the most pro-abortion and unethical president in the history of the United States:
Obama’s apostles are hard to dismiss. Oprah simply calls him “The One,” because “we need politicians who know how to be the truth.” (Jesus says in John 14:6 “I am the way, the truth …”) Oprah goes on to say Obama will help us “evolve to a higher plane,” which would put Obama in the role of our Intelligent Designer.
According to the New York Times, Obama’s volunteers are taught to eschew discussions of the issues and instead “testify” about how they “came to Obama.”
For many, he’s no retro-redeemer, but a 21st-century savior, a Matrix-messiah and Neo for our modern-day Nineveh. Self-help guru Deepak Chopra dubs Obama “a quantum leap in American consciousness,” while prominent “leadership coach” Eve Konstantine assures us that, “He’s our product out of the all-knowing quantum field of intelligence.”
Looking throughout history, different regimes that have been responsible for evil ideologies and policies have been worshipped as messiahs. Sick.
Read the entire article or check out his book, which I have a copy of but am working on reading but I’m busy with PhD work right now, so I can’t vouch for all of it but it does look well-researched.
Pro-Life Book Video on YouTube
Written by admin on | March 10, 2009 | No Comments
Lawsuit for Baby Born Alive
Written by admin on | February 2, 2009 | No Comments
From LifeNews.com:
Miami, FL (LifeNews.com) — A leading pro-life law firm has filed a lawsuit on behalf of a baby born alive after a failed abortion at a Miami abortion business. Following Shanice Denise Osbourne’s birth in July 2006, staff at the abortion facility put her body on the roof of the building to hide her death from local police.
According to witnesses, a young woman went to the GYN Diagnostic Center abortion facility in Hialeah, outside Miami, for an abortion.
Police say the 18-year-old had an abortion and returned the next day complaining of severe stomach pains.
Unbelievable. It is so sick and evil to see how moral relativist abortionists kill the unborn and now the born. The dehumanization against young life has led to sickening atrocities such as this. Some people may have wondered about Jill Stanek when she testified about babies born alive, but she was not lying in her congressional testimony. And this shows that it is more common than we think. Killing innocent human beings is pure evil.
Why does this require a lawsuit though? Why is this not a criminal matter, in that the police should intervene already even without a lawsuit, since the Born Alive Infants Protection Act was passed by Bush and mostly Republicans?
Pro-life cause on facebook!
Written by admin on | December 28, 2008 | No Comments
Culture jam for life has a facebook: add us as a friend if you want at http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=631263806
Also, please join our cause through Facebook Causes! The link is http://apps.facebook.com/causes/178661?m=05e3e92a&recruiter_id=33759287
and add yourself as a fan to the Culture Jam for Life page at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Culture-Jam-for-Life/45757226370
Let’s spread the word to raise awareness against dehumanization of innocent human beings.
Abortion gift certificates
Written by Maria O'Connor on | December 25, 2008 | No Comments
Read the full article at LifeNews.com here.
Looking for that last-minute gift to give to your friend or loved one? Know a young, pregnant girl who doesn’t know what to do? Give away a Christmas gift certificate from Planned Parenthood! Celebrate the birth of Christ with the death of an unborn child.
“Why not buy a loved one a gift this holiday season that they really need,” [Indiana Planned Parenthood CEO] Cockrum says in a press release LifeNews.com obtained. “The gift certificates are also a wonderful idea for that person in your life who puts everyone else first.”
This sounds like a commercial for a cheap electronic product that’s all the rage. Hmmm, should I give my sister a cell phone, or an abortion? Yes, this person puts everyone else first. So much so that an abortion is necessary to keep thinking about other people - it has nothing to do with the selfish idea of making her own life easier, of course not. She’s so selfless, I’ll go with the abortion. She deserves a break. A baby would just make her life way too complicated. It’s good they have these, otherwise she would have had to live with her decision to not be careful enough to not get pregnant.
Back to the article.
Reportedly, Cockrum requested in a press release for citizens to:
“please join Planned Parenthood of Indiana and give the gift of health this holiday season,”
yet Planned Parenthood Indiana’s Vice President Chrystal Struben-Hall confirms that buyers can give the “gift of death,” too.
“Gift of health”, “gift of death”, what’s the difference? Your health as a strong independent woman is more important than that life growing inside of you. Oh, wait, abortion activists say it’s just a jumble of cells that doesn’t mean anything, they must be right.
Gift of death, indeed.
While you’re with your family or friends celebrating the holiday season in whichever way you do and rejoicing over the wonderful presents you’ve received, remember that there are girls and women being given the ability to kill their unborn child at Christmas.
Tags: Abortion > Christmas > gift certificates > planned parenthood
“18 Pro-lifers Arrested for No Reason in MD”
Written by Maria O'Connor on | August 21, 2008 | No Comments
In the most recent Stand True enewsletter, there was a section detailing how 18 people were arrested for no real cause, other than the fact that a State Trooper didn’t like what they were doing.
On August 1st a group of pro-lifers from Maryland was finishing up a day of activism [Pro-lifers stand in various locations, holding signs which show the truth about abortion. Often they will have warning signs making people aware of what they are about to see.] A State Trooper pulled over and told them to stop what they were doing. The trooper threatened them with arrest and refused to cite any law they were breaking. The trooper told one of the participants that “it did not matter what the law was, it only matted what he said it was”.
The group packed up and moved to a different jurisdiction. The trooper followed them and began to arrest them immediately when they set up again. 18 of the pro-lifers were arrested and hauled away without being told what law they had broken. They were not even read their rights. They were held overnight with out a phone call or any contact with their families.
Can we as Americans really just sit idly by and be silent while things like this go on around us? Even if we do not agree with what these citizens were doing, we should not allow them to be harassed because of their beliefs. They did nothing wrong!
The group has now all been released and the State Attorney has dropped all charges. This, however, is far from over. We cannot allow our civil rights to be violated in this manner and we cannot allow police to make up laws and arrest whoever they want. The more this happens without action being taken, the more our rights will be stolen.
We need to take a stand with this. We need to draw attention to this. We can’t just sweep this under the rug and say “oh well, it won’t happen to me”. If we let this go, there’s no telling how many times this will happen again.
Many people don’t agree with them, either with what they were saying or how they were saying it. But that does not mean that their rights should be violated. If they had been doing anything else - like protesting the Iraqi war - would this have been handled the same way? I don’t think so. Let’s raise awareness for this issue to prevent this from happening to other innocent civilians expressing their beliefs.
Tell your friends. Write a Myspace bulletin about it. Send emails. Get the news out.
Open Letter to Rick Warren about Obama’s Abortion Extremism
Written by admin on | August 13, 2008 | No Comments
I got this from RedState.com and thought it’s definitely worth sharing:
I wanted to make sure you saw this letter to Pastor Rick Warren we have posted at RedState. In light of the recent reports about Barack Obama’s opposition to the Born Alive Infant Protect Act (legislation that would require life sustaining medical treatment for infants born alive despite an attempted abortion), the issues Hunter raises in this letter are too important to ignore.
We hope Pastor Warren will ask the tough questions, not just the popular questions.
Erick
The text of the letter, written by Redstate Contributor Hunter Baker, is below:
Dear Pastor Warren,
I am writing to you to express concern about something that may get lost when you host the candidate forum with John McCain and Barack Obama at Saddleback Valley Community Church which is likely to receive national attention. The decision to address you on this question in an open letter comes with some trepidation, but I have attempted to reach you through your media agency, the church email, and your personal email with no effect. I hope this message in a public forum will come to your attention instead of sitting unread in a pile of fan mail and requests for favors.
You see, I understand and appreciate who you are and what you’ve done. You are one of the most widely known pastors in the nation and have written one of the best-selling non-fiction books of the past several decades. I have many times walked into friends’ homes and have seen The Purpose-Driven Life sitting on coffee tables or bookshelves. When Time named you one of the most influential evangelicals in America, I agreed and applauded the selection.
During this period of well-deserved fame, you have been a good steward of the blessings God has provided. You gave away 90% of your massive royalties and repaid your church for years of salary. Instead of following the sometimes frivolous paths of other celebrity pastors, you focused in on the suffering of AIDS victims in Africa. You and your wife Kay have been outstanding role models. You have avoided making intemperate statements. Neither have you become some kind of caricature of the pastor in politics, ready to drop anything for a talking-heads appearance anywhere, anytime.
In your news release about the candidate forum, you suggest that you will avoid “gotcha” questions. The topics highlighted in the release are poverty, HIV/AIDS, climate and human rights with a special emphasis on character and leadership rather than programmatic details.
There is much to be said for rising above partisan politics. After all, the church is on a mission from God to all the earth. It is emphatically not intended to be a tool for either one of the political parties. We are after bigger game than a balanced budget, the right kind of welfare state, or term limits. We seek redemption for a world we believe has lost its way.
However, there are certain issues that demand the church’s involvement, issues of basic justice, issues of life and death. Perhaps the least ambiguous of those issues is the protection of babies throughout pregnancy and immediately after birth. We live in a culture that, strangely, acts as though unborn children are like genies that can be stuffed back into the bottle. We know that isn’t true. We know that abortions end with little piles of bloody flesh and bone. Fetuses don’t merely cease to exist. They experience violent physical death.
There are many doctrinal issues that divide Christians, but the protection of young life should not be one of them. Pastor Warren, as Protestants, we are part of a tradition that loves to point to the early church — the young church so pure in our estimation — still uncorrupted by the power of empire. That church, that persecuted church, was a tireless defender of life. Early Christians counseled against abortion and actively rescued infants exposed to the predators and the wild by Roman parents who vested few rights in human beings shortly after birth. A child of the wrong sex or one who looked weak could be abandoned. How strange it is that today a candidate claiming to be a Christian could oppose the Born Alive Infants Protection Act or a ban on partial birth abortion! To do so is to disclaim not only a major part of Christian teaching, but also a cultural advance in favor of protecting the weak and innocent.
Pastor, you know both John McCain and Barack Obama. You know where they stand on the protection of innocent human life. While it is a fine thing to allow both men to expound upon their experience, their leadership ability, and their attitudes toward challenges of the future like AIDS or climate change, I submit that you would do a disservice to your congregation and to the church at large if you host both candidates and ignore the issue that divides them more clearly than almost any other. Barack Obama has indicated a willingness to change his position on a number of issues, including drilling for oil, the way the Iraq war is conducted, and the proper understanding of gun ownership rights. But his position with regard to abortion rights is positively adamantine. Abortion on demand is non-negotiable. McCain, on the other hand, has consistently voted against a broad abortion license.
Some would respond to me, though I doubt you would, that I am emphasizing one issue unfairly. My answer is that this issue is basic. If the year were 1958, instead of 2008, do you think it would be right to host such a forum and ignore segregation, knowing one candidate was ardently in favor of the separation of the races? You and I both know that it would be wrong to gloss over a glaring breach of that kind. We both know many in the church were wrong in just that way. (It is a terrible irony of history that Mr. Obama now stands with those who favor the persistent removal of an entire class of human beings from legal protection through legal fiat. How I wish it were not so.)
My hope is that you will make no promise to leave the foundational issue of the sanctity of life untouched in this forum. If the lack of that promise means the forum may not take place, then I suggest it would be better to cancel it.
With respect,
Hunter Baker
It’ll be interesting to see if Rick Warren responds to Hunter Baker. I hope Rick doesn’t just give softball questions to Obama, the pro-abortion extremist, but he probably will, sadly.
Tags: Abortion > barack obama > born alive infants protection act > christianity > red state > rick warren
Pro-Abortion Governor Kathleen Sebelius Opposes Pro-Life Democrat
Written by admin on | July 11, 2008 | No Comments
LifeNews has a story from a very pro-abortion governor who has claimed to be “personally pro-life,” a stance that is ridiculous and relativist. A person for the “right” to kill an innocent human being is the opposite of pro-life, they are pro-murder. Read the story here:
keep looking »Topeka, KS (LifeNews.com) — Very rarely does a sitting governor oppose fellow party members running for an election, but pro-abortion Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius is doing just that. The potential Barack Obama running mate is attacking a pro-life Democrat and supporting his primary opponent because she disagrees with his abortion stance.
